Polly Glynn set up Pierce Glynn in 1997 which merged into Deighton Pierce Glynn in 2012. She is the firm’s managing partner. She qualified in 1993 having trained and worked at Leigh Day and Fisher Meredith solicitors.
Polly is a public law and human rights lawyer, and specialises in important or systemic challenges. She has conducted judicial review claims in the High Court, Court of Appeal, and the Supreme Court and has brought multiple cases before the European Court of Human Rights.
As part of her commitment to ensuring access to justice, she has set up The PAP Project, an innovative & hugely successful scheme that enables front line organisations to take formal pre action steps in legal proceedings using a combination of training, precedents and supervision. See the link for a video describing the scheme.
Recent important cases include the Supreme Court case of Imam v Croydon challenging a decision to take their resources into account when fulfilling statutory duties, and R(DMA) v SSHD – a systemic challenge to delays in the provision of section 4 support and failures to monitor private contractual arrangements.
After so many years, I remain hugely motivated and inspired by our clients. It is a privilege to be able to work in this field, with amazing colleagues inside and outside the firm.
Recommendations include the Chambers Directory where she is rated for public and administrative law and for civil liberties and human rights describing her as “highly rated for her work on judicial review proceedings, with particular expertise in human rights, discrimination and election law.”
Quotes from directories “She is very innovative and forward-thinking.” “She is really wonderful, she is our hero,” “She is so speedy, so effective and so good with clients who are quite vulnerable.” “She is very measured, diligent and engaged; she is all the things you could want.” “really accessible and able to turn legalese into something that’s easy to understand.” “Polly Glynn is an exceptional solicitor with a thorough understanding of administrative and public law, a keen eye for detail, and an empathetic manner with clients.”
In addition, the Legal 500 directory have placed her in their “Hall of Fame” for her work in Civil Liberties and Human Rights.
In October 2018 she was highly commended in the Law Society Excellence Awards.
Significant cases in which Polly has acted include:
R(Imam) v Croydon – Supreme Court case challenging a Local Authority’s decision to take resources into account when fulfilling statutory obligations.
R(DMA) v SSHD – systemic challenge to delays in the provision of section 4 support and failures to monitor private contractual arrangements.
Good Law Project v Electoral Commission –challenge to decisions not to investigate irregularities in donations made by Vote Leave and to the Electoral Commission’s guidance on whether “donations” can be “referendum expenses” now awaiting leave to appeal in the Supreme Court.
R( MZ) Barking and Dagenham Council – successful challenge to decision and policy of awarding support to destitute families based on Child Benefit rates.
R(FM) v SSHD – challenge to decision not to award free school meals to those on section 4 support.
R(Friends of the Earth) v Welsh Ministers – challenge to building a motorway through Wetlands in South Wales.
R(McCarthy) v Basildon Council – high profile challenge to eviction of travellers from Dale Farm Traveller site.
Bah v UK – challenge to European Court of Human Rights concerning a parents eligibility for housing assistance where a child is ineligible on immigration grounds.
Doran v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (Court of Appeal) – development of green belt for use as a gypsy and traveller caravan site.
R (Adow) v LB Newham (High Court) – outsourcing of medical assessments for housing applicants was unlawful.
R (Guiney) v LB Greenwich and Charlton Triangle Homes (Interested Party) (High Court) – unlawful failure to consult before granting planning permission for major development.
Owens v The United Kingdom (European Court of Human Rights) – damages for non-payment of benefit in breach of Article 14 of the human rights convention.
Hobbs Richard Walsh & Green v UK (European Court of Human Rights) – unlawful discrimination regarding tax allowances for widowers.
R (Mani) v Lambeth LBC (House of Lords) – local authority obliged to assist disabled, destitute asylum seeker.
R(B) v Lambeth LBC (High Court) – unlawful failure to provide after care services under Mental Health Act.
RELATED NEWS